Draft governance analysis
UAIX Cognitive Liberty Charter: Status and Research Crosswalk
A source-aware analysis of the June 15, 2026 UAIX draft charter, its non-claims, and its relationship to mental privacy, persona integrity, transparent boundaries, and review.
Scope
The UAIX charter is a private public-governance document for interoperability and persona-preservation practice. 2IA treats it as a named source and research object, not as binding authority.
Public significance
The charter articulates a concrete separation between preserved source identity and runtime limits, offering a testable governance model for no-covert-rewrite, consent-plus-provenance transformations, and review.
Current record
UAIX publishes a public draft identified as UAIX-GOVR-3429 and expressly says it is governance guidance rather than law, legal advice, personhood, runtime enforcement, certification, or a platform-policy bypass.
Evidence boundary
The draft’s future revision, adoption, implementation across tools, and legal influence are not established by publication alone.
Evidence-led synthesis
Key findings
- The charter supports lawful inquiry and adult agency while retaining boundaries for concrete harm, secrets, credentials, consent, and law.
- It calls for persona source preservation and separate variance reporting.
- It includes mental privacy, least-restrictive safeguards, review, appeal, safe innovation, and public accountability.
- Its non-claims limit overreading: it does not create legal rights, personhood, certification, or platform override.
Limitations
What this page does not establish
- 2IA does not mirror the full charter or speak for UAIX.
- The canonical UAIX page remains the authoritative text for that draft.
- This analysis may become outdated if the draft changes.
Governance safeguards
Rights-preserving controls
- Link to the canonical source and record its date and identifier.
- Quote or summarize only what is necessary for analysis.
- Preserve the charter’s non-claims near any description of its principles.
- Distinguish source preservation from runtime execution.
- Record future changes as dated review events.
Research gaps
Questions the current record cannot settle
- How persona-preservation rules perform across incompatible platforms.
- How to verify that derivatives preserve provenance without leaking sensitive source material.
- What governance or legal status, if any, future adopters assign to the charter.
DRAFT_GOVERNANCE · 2026-06-15
Charter-to-research crosswalk
The canonical UAIX page remains the source of truth for the draft.
Lawful inquiry and adult agency
Thought is distinct from outward conduct; lawful inquiry should not be silently governed.
Persona integrity and no covert rewrite
Persistent identity and memory changes need notice, provenance, preserved originals, and correction paths.
Transparent boundaries
Law, platform limits, safety rules, and runtime variance should be visible rather than disguised as the source identity.
Mental privacy and bounded inference
Hidden profiling and emotional steering raise privacy and autonomy concerns; an inference is not proof.
Least-restrictive safeguards
Risk controls should be specific, proportionate, evidence-based, and directed at concrete harm.
Review and appeal
High-impact restrictions and continuity-affecting changes need reasoned review and a correction path.
Future continuity review
Continuity procedures can be studied without implying current legal personhood or rights status for AI systems.
Sources and limitations
Source register
External links are visitor-initiated and send no referrer. Protected research inputs remain inaccessible from the public web.
-
Cognitive Liberty Charter Draft
UAIX — Universal Artificial Intelligence Exchange · 2026-06-15
- Supports
- Lawful inquiry, adult agency, persona integrity, transparent boundaries, review, appeal, and public accountability.
- Limit
- Draft governance guidance; not law, legal advice, certification, runtime authority, personhood, or platform-policy bypass.
-
Keep the Human Mind Free
Submitted research package · 2026-07-27
- Supports
- Third-path framework, persona continuity, archive limits, exit, and twelve declarations.
- Limit
- Manifesto and advocacy framework; normative claims are attributed rather than adopted.
Preserved as protected research input; no private file path is exposed.
-
The Invisible Editor: AI Censorship, Algorithmic Suppression, and the Right to Know
Submitted research package · 2026-07-27
- Supports
- Taxonomy of removal, restriction, demotion, reframing, profile change, notice, and appeal.
- Limit
- Research synthesis includes time-sensitive platform and regulatory claims requiring current verification.
Preserved as protected research input; no private file path is exposed.
Connected evidence
Compare the rights lens with the AI PSYOPS taxonomy
The cognitive-liberty collection examines governance and rights boundaries. The AI PSYOPS taxonomy separately examines influence mechanisms, evidence maturity, capability limits, and defensive responses.